Models
Credit to John Montroll for designing most of these, credit to me for making
them perfectly! ALL of them are from a square of paper, no cuts. The
paper is rarely larger than 6"x6". You can read more about them at the
bottom of the page. All of the pictures on here are clickable for zoomed in
views.
My original models
All of these have been designed by me
| My Dragon Obviously, my favorite. Pleated wings, a horn, flat tail, it has all that is required. A perfect Dragon. I designed it many years ago, bored out of my mind in High School. I was originally trying to design a Brontosaurus (I had earlier made a few other dinosaurs). There were these two long, annoying flaps along the side that I kept trying to find different ways to tuck under it and hide them. It was then I realized I could stretch them out and make wings! Amazingly enough, given a flat sheet of paper, my first attempt at dragon wings was perfect. Very little has changed from my original design. I thought it was the best Dragon out there until I saw Satoshi Kamiyas "Divine Dragon" in the book Origamido. I was completely blown away. I don't mind the number two slot. I hated the poor quality of the first pictures of my dragon, so I made a new one and took much higher quality pictures of it. A couple minor things have changed, most importantly, the head looks much better. Here is a better picture of my wing design. Also, here is a picture of a "concept test" dragon head I recently made. I found a way to safely divide up the tip of the horn, which not only lets me have two separate horns, I twist them up so they appear more realistic. I also added nostrils. I included a few pictures of this dragon as it was being made. (If you are good at origami and use those pictures to reverse engineer it, I am coming after you!) I also recently designed my first iso-area animal, which is an inverted dragon that actually starts inside-out (white) and ends up two colors, the belly, neck and bottom of the tail come out white (under scales) while the top comes out the normal color. The end result looks similar, but they are made completely different. |
|
| 6 Legged Lizard This is the kind of thing that happens when you mix beer and origami. I had set out to make an Iguana, since I had never seen a good one. Things got a little wierd, and I ended up with 6 legs. Altogether not too bad, though. I keep it around because it is funny.
|
![]() |
| Vampire Bird This thing is downright insane. I started with a piece of paper and just started folding. I named the monstrosity I created 'Vampire Bird' after a Wesley Willis song. It has all the requirements of a really cool looking eagle, except all the pieces are in the wrong places. Legs on its back, backwards wings, really funny to look at. |
![]() |
| Triple Crane I studied a book about the Rokoan Style for my inspiration here. Rokoan Style is the art of making several cranes all connected at the wing from one piece of paper. This particular model I designed as a gift when some Japanese neighbors moved in. It is a red/white sheet of paper with dimensions of 4x1, but I made three cranes out of the middle, and left a half on each end, it came out as a base for the model. Truly beautiful, and probably the most elegant thing I have ever designed. |
![]() |
Foreward
This is a foreward, but I figure 99% of the people coming to this page just want to see the pictures, so here it is at the end. If you want to send me mail, feel free.
I have been doing Origami for over 10 years, probably something like 12 or 13 years if I had to pin down a date. With this page I will explain a little bit about the art, its characteristics, and show some examples of beautiful design, as well as some of my own creations. To me, origami is not just any paper art. Making a kite is not origami, regardless of how much paper you use. Also, you must start with a square. A paper airplane is not origami. There can be no cuts, unless you are cutting the square into smaller squares. Anything else is cheap.
There are several "schools" of origami, as far as I am concerned. I have named them.
Traditional
Traditional origami, usually associated with Japanese paperfolders, where "less is more" is the motto. Admittedly, many masterpieces have come from this art. Some of my favorite traditional folders are Akira Yoshizawa, Kunihiko Kasahara, and Toshie Takahama. They can make amazingly accurate and lifelike animals that are extremely easy to fold. Usually, the difference between an amateur traditional piece and a masters work are minute creases and folds to make the simple structure more lifelike or appear animated. Traditional models are usually folded with around 12 steps and never use any difficult structures. It is not uncommon for a traditional crab or octopus to only have 2 or 4 legs. Mr. Yoshizawa, a legend in Japan and the admitted Grandmaster of origami can take a blank, flat section of paper and make an animated human or animal face out of it, with just creases and pinches. He lives and works in a humidity controlled house and has cataloged thousands upon thousands of animals and people. Rumor has it every animal is perfectly represented within his huge hoard of models. The goal for many of the worlds origami masters is to ask entry into his house, and be admitted.
Unit
Unit origami is seen equally in all cultures. It relies heavily on mathematics and 3D modeling to create all sorts of 3D objects. Every manner of three dimensional construct has been made with unit origami, and the results are usually amazing. It gets its name from the fact that it takes several pieces of one identical unit that when combined create a three dimensional form. Some forms require 3, 4, or 6 units, and some models have been constructed with over 1,000 identical units. Tomoko Fuse is far and away my favorite unit origami master. Unit origami also incorporates boxes and containers, which Fuse also specializes in.
Complex
Complex origami is usually associated with Americans, but there are many "new school" Japanese folders that have picked up this style and done amazing things with it. Complex origami has only one goal: to make the perfect representation of whatever object (usually an animal) you are trying to create. For this reason, many complex origami models take extremely long periods of time to create (much less design!) and they almost always have very difficult steps during the construction. If folder from this school sets out to make an animal, say a crab, it is going to be pefect. It is going to have 8 legs, two claws (with pinchers), two antennae, two eyes, and a perfectly formed shell. Anything short of this is not acceptable to the artist. For this reason, complex models usually have hundreds of steps, and sometimes require very large and thin sheets of paper. Some of my favorite complex folders are John Montroll, Peter Engel, Toshikazu Kawasaki, and Robert Lang. All three of them have their own styles, too. John Montroll is, in my opinion, the greatest American folder ever to live. He has made thousands of models, not a single one of them lacking any leg, eye, ear, tail, tentacle, or claw. Peter Engel is a mathematics professor by trade, and one day sort of snapped and started analyzing what happens to paper when folded. He has made many excellent models, and even better, written many things about how he plans and designs models. Robert Lang has made many great models, and is one of the few (the only?) who I do not frown on for using non-square paper. But on the flipside, many of the models he has designed using rectangular paper, I have seen Montroll do just as good or better with a simple square.
My Style
I definitely come from the Complex school, like nearly all American folders from 1980 on up. As for technique, I have definitely mastered the complex style. There is nothing left to fold that I cannot fold. This was always my goal, and now that I am here I am extremely disappointed. I find myself able to fold anything no matter how difficult, but unable to create anything more complicated than simple fish and birds. I see the paper, I see the folds, I understand where it goes and what it does, I just lack the creativity to plan it correctly. This is aided by the fact that being a perfectionist, I am never happy with what I do unless it is completely perfect. Having made perfect crabs and lobsters and turtles for so many years, when I set out to make a squid or something, unless it is perfectly porportioned and has all of its tentacles, eyes, and whatnot, I label it a failure. I find myself constantly pushing the envelope not to do better, but smaller. If I get a model down perfectly using 6" paper, I then try it with 3". My most beautiful works have all been tiny little creations. This is offset by the fact that I am 6'4 and have huge hands, as you can see in the tiny lobster pictures.
I have good results from just grabbing a piece of paper and folding, for example the dragon on this page is 100% mine, made up while trying to design something else entirely. I designed a Basset Hound which was 100% dead on perfect, ears and everything, but I only made one and to date I have no idea where it is. I used to store my favorite things in little white cardboard jewelry boxes, the kind with the foam on top and bottom. They sat up in the loft of my house for years, and when I moved I noticed 90% of the boxes were now empty. I really do not know what happened to them. Looted by admiring friends and visitors, I suppose. I do not mind, having made literally tens of thousands of cool origami critters in my life, I have about 5, and those were made recently. Everything I make I give away. Once created, it has been conquered, and there is no reason for me to keep it around as proof to myself. Most of the models on my page are not designed by me. In fact, around 80% of them are designed by John Montroll, who as you probably remember, is my favorite. Near the bottom are some of my creations, most of which are insane. I hope you enjoy viewing my work as much as I enjoy creating it.